Submit Spotlight A Teacher Transformed Through Training

Are certain individuals born to be teachers and can only those be truly competent? Or can people without such aspirations develop to become ‘great teachers’? Are there certain conditions, the presence of which foster such development? Are these conditions internal (personality, temperament) or external (support, opportunity)? These are some questions which emerged during conversations with an unassuming teacher in a school in Dharsiwa, a rural town in Raipur.

The School

PS Ramsagarpara is housed in a small building off the main road. It consists of four classrooms and one small room for teachers. The school has 99 children with roughly equal gender distribution. On average, 70-75 children attend school per day. Most children come from labourer families, which means their parents work long hours and children spend many hours unsupervised, which is a major reason for incomplete homework and alcohol use among teenagers. Discrimination in school is not a concern, students mostly mingle with everyone. Average attendance in the parent-teacher meetings (PTMs) is 30-35 since most parents are daily wage workers and/or do not have time and energy to engage with their child’s education.

The children eat their mid-day meal in the long corridor between the classrooms. Space is a major restriction in the school; there is no space to play or have activities which require movement.

Personal journey of the teacher

Ms Gayatri comes from a humble family where meeting daily needs was a struggle. Being one of 5 sisters and 3 brothers, she, at a young age, had to leave education and start working due to the family’s financial constraints. After a few years, she went back to school and finished her schooling. After her schooling, she did not particularly aspire to be a teacher but her father found her a teaching job and she joined only because of the family’s financial needs.

Gayatri considered teaching as just her job and went about it daily without much deliberation. In 2010, she taught classes I to III due to a shortage of teachers. She says she found it difficult to teach three grades together and often found herself ill-equipped to do so. She resorted to rote teaching-learning because of both, teaching multi-levels and her own inability.

In 2017, the Azim Premji Foundation (APF) offered an English proficiency course to her. She had always fancied being fluent in English and decided to go ahead. What followed were workshops on teaching methods and pedagogy which marked the beginning of a total shift in the way she viewed her job. In her world, she would have never imagined that there were any other ways to teach but the workshops completely captivated her; she saw routes to change which she did not know existed.

Narrating the workshop experience, Ms Gayatri looked buoyant; she recollected how awed she was by the patience and calmness of the facilitator. It initiated the process of self-realization in her; whenever she lost her temper with the students, she would think ‘what would the workshop facilitator have done in this situation’? She also started maintaining a reflective diary which helped her with this process of self-realization and transition.

This reflected in her practice; the central learning from her training was that children can learn on their own and enjoy exploring and experimenting.  For example, she shifted to using word webs; progressing from words to alphabets instead of making the children mug up ABC, she started using TLMs and stories more often. She understood the value of leaving books, chart papers, models and learning material in the class for children to browse through in their free time.

Pedagogy adopted

Study groups: Finishing homework had been a recurrent challenge for the children especially because they did not have anyone at home to help them with their work. Ms Gayatri mapped out the addresses of the children in her class and grouped them in 3-4 people groups based on proximity. These groups would decide a time and sit together to finish homework. This form of peer support worked remarkably; though it’s still not 100%, many more students do their homework. Ms Gayatri stated that it also helped in boosting children’s self-esteem and confidence.

TLMs: Each month Ms Gayatri creates a corner where picture cards, models and words relevant to that month’s learning are put up. The aim is to provide the material to children so that they can explore and learn in their own time. During observations, children were seen trying to read the words and have a conversation about things that they had never seen, for example, some fruits and vegetables that are alien to them.

Story circles: To foster language development, for classes I and II, Ms Gayatri conducts story circles wherein children either draw and then talk about their drawings, or narrate some story from their home/day, or she narrates a story with picture/word cards.
Assumptions about children: One of the greatest shifts that Ms Gayatri felt with regard to her teaching was her perspective about how children learn and what they are capable of doing. After realizing that children can learn on their own, the purpose of using TLMs and leaving material for exploration started making sense to her. She could also use this knowledge to tap into the natural curiosity of children; this tool turned out to be very useful to retain the attention of children. Her interactions with students shifted from using punishment and scolding to simply conversing with them. The shift was gradual and often not linear, but she is grateful for this process. The response of children to this shift has been so significant, that other teachers in the school and few from other schools have extended their desire to adopt the same practices.

Teacher-learner relationship: During an observation of her class, her sensitivity towards the children was evident. She engaged with them deeply and gave them space to express their doubts and ask questions beyond what was being taught. Class participation was significant, and she allowed children to momentarily lose attention but come back to classwork.

Assessment: Her learning has also contributed to her understanding of how and what to test in children. She considers assessment as part of pedagogy and is now able to practice continuous assessment to a degree. She also actively changes her teaching methods according to the results obtained. For example, for reading’s assessment, she wrote some fun instruction on the board; children needed to read the instruction and follow the action. This tests both reading and comprehensive ability, while still being fun for the children.

Impact on the school: Learning levels, curiosity levels and mobilizing other teachers

The school with only 3 teachers across 5 grades and 99 students, was experiencing a significant shortage of teachers. Due to this and the lack of the teachers’ own capacity, the children engaged in rote learning; teachers wrote questions and answers on the board and the students copied.

After Ms Gayatri adapted a teaching methodology, there was an almost immediate difference in the learning and participation levels of the children. Gradually, children of class I started reading, their interaction in class increased, and it seemed that they understood far more than before.  She expressed that even to her, the classes were more enjoyable. According to one of her colleagues, by the end of the academic session in which she first adopted this new pedagogy and assessment, 90% of their class I children learnt to read with understanding.

Seeing the results, other teachers got inspired and consequently, 3 teachers from this school and 2 from another formed a learning group to adopt this pedagogy. Currently, Ms Gayatri leads this initiative. From interaction with the other teachers, it was evident that they were very proud of the progress they had all made. One of them exclaimed: “यह हमारी लीडर मेम साहिब है, यह सीख के आती है और हमको सिखाती है’ (This is our leader Mem Sahib, she learns and then teaches us).

Reflecting on it, Gayatri teacher attributed her progress to both, family support and the knowledge that she received in the workshop. Family support enabled her to give more to work, for example, often her husband and kids make TLMs and they are accommodative on days that she has to work late. The training, on the other hand, opened her mind to the buffet of possibilities that lay in front of her and enabled her to feel accomplishment and growing in her job.

Teacher Gayatri is currently being trained to be a mentor to other teachers. While she feels anxious and conscious about how this will unfold, there is pride and passion in possibilities that have opened up for her as a teacher. She expressed that she has truly found her feet as a teacher recently; she could never have imagined that training could make such a big impact in her life and that she would be able to contribute in enriching the lives of other people.

Through the eyes of children

Conversations with children centred around who a good teacher is and what they like about school. They responded saying: शिक्षिका ऐसी होनी चाहिए जो अच्छे से बात करे, गाली न दे, हमरे साथ बैठे और खेल करवाए (The teacher should be someone who talks well, does not abuse, sits with us and makes us play).

They instantly linked these attributes to Ms Gayatri saying that a teacher should be like her. When asked why, they replied: वह मारती नहीं है I मज़ा आता है क्लास मैं, जैसे कहानिया, नाटक, चित्र कार्ड (‘She doesn’t hit us. We have fun in her class like stories, acting, picture cards).

Children expressed that they liked coming to school because they get to meet friends and play with them. They all believed that they need to go to school to do well in their future, earn money and become a big person.

Perspective of District Institute members

Since 2015, Ms Gayatri has been continuously engaged with APF through educational activities, such as workshops, cluster meetings, school visit, Voluntary Teacher Forums (VTFs)1, Bal Melas and seminars. Her engagement on VTFs has been consistent and she has also facilitated some of the sessions in workshops. She truly follows continuous teacher professional development. Some significant changes as seen by the district institute (DI) members were:

Change in thinking and belief system: Compared to earlier, positive changes in her classroom practice and children’s learning are clearly visible. For example, she gives equal opportunity to all students of class I to participate in various activities (poetry, story, games).

Action-oriented learning: She is prompt in implementing her leanings, for example, she very quickly adapted her pedagogy to follow the whole language method, phonological awareness and creating a print-rich environment.

Networking and knowledge sharing: Teacher Gayatri shares her experience with staff and other school teachers during cluster meeting, and workshops.

Pedagogy: Her work with the children in the classroom is remarkable. She does not maintain hierarchy among the children or the teachers. She believes in working together with the children and tries to involve every child in the learning process.

Note from one of the DI members

“I met Gayatri Jangde through the English Proficiency Couse. She has, recently, successfully completed EPC Level 3. She is more spontaneous, dynamic and confident now than before. She is extremely interested in improving herself. After observing her class and having a discussion with us, she created plans to change her methods. It would be an understatement to say that she is giving her best. Even the material she uses to make her classroom print-rich must be hung in the morning and taken off at the end of the day as the middle school continues in the same room. She has just brushed these problems aside and created her own way out of it.”


Coming back to the questions in the beginning – Ms Gayatri didn’t grow up wanting to be a teacher, neither did she have a passion to become a better teacher once she started working as one. However, when she got an opportunity to learn, she blossomed. This raises a question; does getting an opportunity enable a person to become more open to learning or does one’s pre-existing openness impact what a person takes away from an opportunity? Did the workshop she attended facilitate Ms Gayatri to be more open to learning or did she possess openness as a trait and that enabled her to make the most of the workshop?

A member from the DI expressed that after working for so long with teachers and their training, she is now able to recognize teachers who would be open to learning. Some characteristics of this are: they like engaging in debates during the training; they don’t accept things on face value; they ask questions; they show a willingness to engage after school hours; some of them remain silent but are extremely attentive; they actually reach out on phone post the training asking for help. The conversations often start with them saying, ‘Please don’t mind me calling you like this, but would you please give some suggestion for….’

Another important factor expressed both by the teacher and the DI member was the role of pivotal support systems – having a supportive family and some elbow room in school enables the teacher to apply her learning.

Perhaps then, it is the marriage of internal dispositions and external factors that contribute to the making of a teacher. From Ms Gayatri’s example, we can see just how important a role training can play, and that has important implications on the role of teacher training.

Ritika Gupta, Lecturer, Azim Premji University

Republished from University Practice Connect website, Azim Premji University


19992 registered users
7804 resources